Legal Opinion

Cowing v. Wofford

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1924No. Civ. No. 4454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover the sum o£ $1,250 as a commission alleged to be due upon a broker’s contract for the sale of certain real property. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the amount claimed, together with interest in the sum of $362.50 and costs, and defendants appeal.

The questions presented are whether or not the written authorization relied upon contains a sufficient description of the property to satisfy the statute of frauds, and, if insufficient, whether such insufficiency was cured 'by parol and extrinsic evidence had at the trial.

The complaint is in two counts. The "allegations of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Maze v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Proulx v. Sacramento Valley Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Ingalls v. Monte Cristo Oil & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Eastview Estates Ii, Debtor. Perry T. Christison, Trustee for Eastview Estates II v. The Norm Ross Company and Eli Perlman Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Pray v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Avis v. RebhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Sherwood v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API