Legal Opinion

Avis v. Rebhan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1928No. Docket No. 5366PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs commenced the action to recover the sum of $1,075 alleged to have been earned as brokers’ commission in the sale of defendants’ ranch and certain personal property thereon. The appeal is prosecuted from a judgment in favor of defendants. On August 17, 1923, defendant J. C. Rebhan and Jennie L. Wagner met, through the instrumentality of plaintiffs, at defendants’ ranch and signed the following memorandum agreement for the purchase and sale of the property:

“Pomona, Calif., Aug. 17, 1923.
“Received from Jennie L. Wagner $500.00 on account of a total purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Maze v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wood & Tatum Co. v. BaslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cowing v. WoffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pray v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Manuel Torres v. ArbonaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  3. Clark v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Dean v. SargentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Avis v. RebhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API