Legal Opinion

In Re Horton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1991No. S012531PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

The issue in this case is whether a court commissioner may conduct a trial in a capital case when no oral or written stipulation of the parties authorized him to sit as a temporary judge, but when defense counsel proceeded to trial without objection, knowing that the judge was a court commissioner. Petitioner contends that the right to be tried by a regularly appointed or elected superior court judge is a fundamental and personal one that can only be waived after full admonition of the defendant and after he has entered an express waiver of the right on the record. We…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API