Legal Opinion
Kern County Department of Child Support Services v. Camacho
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 2012No. F062883PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
In this family law case, appellant Raul Camacho, Jr., filed a motion in the trial court to modify the amount of arrears he owed for child support. Appellant claimed that the computation of arrears presented by respondent Kem County Department of Child Support Services (the Department) was mistaken because it failed to account for numerous extra payments he had made toward child support over the years. An evidentiary hearing was held before Commissioner Ralph L. McKnight, Jr., who determined that some of the extra payments should be credited toward appellant’s child support…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ochoa v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sander v. State Bar of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- S.H. v. M.M. (In re C.E.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cnty. of San Diego Dep't of Child Support Servs. v. C.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Alliance San Diego v. California Taxpayers Action NetworkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- County of San Diego Dept. of Child Support etc. v. G.S. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.