Legal Opinion
Loeterman v. Town of Brookline
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 6, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-670-MCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McNAUGHT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs are Ben and Mardi Loeterman, purchasers of a condominium unit in Brookline, Massachusetts, and the defendants are the Town of Brookline (the Town) and the Rent Control Board of Brookline (Rent Control Board). The Attorney General of Massachusetts has also intervened in this action as a defendant. The plaintiffs seek a declaration that the Town’s bylaw amendment prohibiting owners of individual condominium units from recovering possession of their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fragopoulos v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Blue Chip Properties v. Permanent Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ben Loeterman v. Town of BrooklineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984