Legal Opinion
Nash v. City of Santa Monica
California Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1984No. L.A. 31798Published
1Opinion of the Court
37 Cal.3d 97 (1984)
688 P.2d 894
207 Cal. Rptr. 285
JEROME J. NASH, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. L.A. 31798.
Supreme Court of California.
October 25, 1984.
COUNSEL
Robert M. Myers, City Attorney, Stephen S. Stark, Assistant City Attorney, Karl M. Manheim and Susan L. Carroll, Deputy City Attorneys, Michael Heumann, Stephen P. Wiman, David Pettit and Mary Ann Yurkonis for Defendants and Appellants.
Natalie E. West, City Attorney (Berkeley), Penny Nakatsu, Terry B. Friedman, Elyse S. Kline, Jana Zimmer, Merced Martin, Marc B. Mihaly,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.