Legal Opinion
People v. Byrd
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1974No. Crim. 11711PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
State of California appeals from the granting of respondents’ motion to suppress pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 and respondents’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 995.
On November 22, 1972, defendants-respondents James Byrd and Leigh Moser were charged by complaint with possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5), and possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530). Byrd was also charged with possession, of a dirk or dagger. (Pen. Code, § 12020.) The respondents entered pleas of not guilty.
On January 8, 1973, a hearing was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. VeronicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. KnoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. Superior Court (Stevens)California Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.