Legal Opinion

People v. Lilienthal

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1978No. Crim. 20516PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*895Opinion

MANUEL, J.

On this appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on his plea of guilty, defendant William Lilienthal seeks review of the validity of the seizure of evidence from his person and automobile. A preliminary question that must be decided is whether defendant is entitled to appellate review of the issue. Although we conclude that the appeal lies under Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (m),1 we further conclude that the evidence was validly seized. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Defendant was charged by complaint with unlawful possession of cocaine for sale (Health &…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. TriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Wimberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API