Legal Opinion
Consolidated Irrigation District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 2012No. F063534PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
Consolidated Irrigation District (CID) petitions for a writ of mandate after the respondent superior court denied CID’s motion to conduct limited discovery, a motion to augment the record of proceedings,1 and a petition for writ of mandate under the California Public Records Act (Public Records Act) (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.).2 The superior court’s orders were issued in a proceeding brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)3 that challenged the City of Selma’s (City) approval of an environmental impact report (EIR)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Filarsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Board of Pilot Commissioners v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.