Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Stevens)

California Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1974No. S.F. 23136PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

The People seek mandamus to compel the respondent court to set aside an order granting a motion to suppress evidence which was found in the search of an apartment claimed to have been occupied by the real parties in interest. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (o).)

The real parties in interest (Clarence Stevens, Teresa Bustillos, and Pamela Thames) first moved to suppress evidence át the preliminary hearing. The magistrate denied the motion and held the real parties in interest to answer on charges of violating Health and Safety Code sections 11350 (possession of certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. HavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. ByrdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API