Legal Opinion

Ach v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1940No. 43331Published

1Opinion of the Court

*536memorandum

Per Guriam:

On the trial and submission of this case the principal issue raised was that the record failed to disclose that any orders were issued by the Major General Commandant of the Marine Corps or the Secretary of the Navy directing drill duties to be performed by the plaintiff’s organization; in other words, that there were.no competent orders for the drills which the plaintiff performed. In the former opinion, the court held that there were competent orders for such drills and the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The majority of the court is still of the opinion that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kings County Savings Institution v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913
  3. Goodman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API