Opitz v. Schenck
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between the motorcycle on which he was riding and an automobile which defendant was driving. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff on a verdict of the jury for two thousand dollars.
The accident happened at the intersection of Washington Street and Crenshaw Boulevard, in the city of Los Angeles, and occurred through the negligent operation by defendant of his automobile over and across the intersection of said streets.
The first point urged for a reversal is that the complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cragg v. Los Angeles Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Cunningham v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Coleman v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Clay v. Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. FreemanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.