Legal Opinion

Cragg v. Los Angeles Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1908No. L.A. No. 2165PublishedCited by 48 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los. Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

-This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and order denying a new trial in an action brought by plaintiff, an employee of defendant, to recover damages on account of personal injuries sustained in the falling of an elevator in defendant’s building, alleged to have been due to-the negligence of defendant. The action was tried by the court, without a jury, and the principal claim of defendant, on this appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain-the findings in several respects.

The allegation.of negligence in the complaint as amended was as follows: “That on said 26th day of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bragg v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Siemers v. EisenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People v. ManoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API