Legal Opinion
Coleman v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1930No. Docket No. 7172PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, City of Oakland, entered after an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff's third amended complaint.
The plaintiff sought to recover for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have been caused by a motor-truck owned and operated by defendant, City of Oakland. Paragraph IV of the complaint contains an allegation that the collision was caused by a dangerous and defective mechanical condition of said motor-truck, to wit, a broken spring, which rendered the truck unmanageable; together with allegations of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- White v. St. Louis & Meramec River RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- City of Kokomo v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Moore v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Stillwell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.