State v. Meyer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
The state contends that the district court clearly erred by dismissing a felony-murder charge against respondent in favor of the more specific charge of controlled-substance murder for a death caused by a methamphetamine-laboratory explosion. Because we conclude that the district court did not err, we affirm.
FACTS
In January 2001, materials allegedly used to manufacture methamphetamines exploded in the basement of a house where they were stored. The explosion critically injured an occupant of the house, James Erick Chilson. Witnesses told an officer who was near the scene…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. BundeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. CarithersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009