Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 2002No. CX-02-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

The state contends that the district court clearly erred by dismissing a felony-murder charge against respondent in favor of the more specific charge of controlled-substance murder for a death caused by a methamphetamine-laboratory explosion. Because we conclude that the district court did not err, we affirm.

FACTS

In January 2001, materials allegedly used to manufacture methamphetamines exploded in the basement of a house where they were stored. The explosion critically injured an occupant of the house, James Erick Chilson. Witnesses told an officer who was near the scene…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. BundeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. CarithersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API