State v. Vasquez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of third-degree unintentional controlled-substance murder, arguing that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury that he could not be convicted based on uncorroborated accomplice testimony. Because we conclude that the involvement of an accomplice required the district court to instruct the jury on the requirement of corroboration of accomplice testimony, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
On May 29, 2007, police were dispatched to a restaurant parking lot where they found an unconscious female, A.E.W., slumped over behind the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.