Legal Opinion

State v. Carithers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1992No. C9-91-2423PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

We granted review in this case to address a question certified to the court of appeals as important and doubtful:

When a married couple jointly acquires a Schedule I controlled substance, and one of the partners uses that substance and subsequently dies from a drug overdose, did the legislature intend that the surviving partner be subject to prosecution under Minn.Stat. § 609.195(b)?

Minnesota Statute § 609.195(b) (1990) is a special felony murder statute declaring it murder in the third degree if one, without intent to kill, proximately causes the death of another person by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Susanne M. Hutchinson, United States of America v. Gordon EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. CarithersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. VarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. People v. CootsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API