Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Wineburgh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 1953No. Civ. A. 862-53PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

In this action the plaintiffs seek relief against the defendant to enforce certain provisions in a contract of employment entered into between the parties on the third day of .September 1947, wherein the plaintiff agreed to employ the defendant at a salary of $80 per week, such employment to be terminable by either party upon notice in writing. Contained in said agreement are certain provisions wherein the defendant agreed not to disclose to any person, firm or corporation the name, address or requirements of customers of the company, nor to divulge any other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Erikson v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  4. Byram v. VaughnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Allison v. SeigleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellis v. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Deutsch v. BarskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Kutka v. Temporaries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  4. American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Saul v. ThalisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API