Legal Opinion
Keady v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 2000No. 99 CIV. 11460(AGS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff, a former employee of defendant St. John’s University, alleges that defendants forced him to resign for refusing to wear athletic apparel bearing the Nike logo. Currently before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss, and plaintiffs cross-motion for leave to amend his complaint. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted and plaintiffs motion is denied.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff James Ready is an individual residing in the State of New York. (Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, Compensatory…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Collette v. St. Luke's Roosevelt HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Scholastic, Inc. v. StoufferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Daniel v. SafirDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Keady v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Aslin v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.