Legal Opinion

Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 5, 2000No. 99 Civ. 11480(AGS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

This action centers on certain intellectual property rights related to the Harry Potter series of books, which are written, published and marketed by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs and counterclaim defendants Scholastic, Inc. (“Scholastic”), J.K. Rowling (“Rowling”), and Time Warner Entertainment Company (“TWE”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) request a declaratory judgment that (i) they have not infringed and are not infringing any of defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Nancy Stouffer’s (“Stouffer’s”) copyrights or trademarks, and (ii) Stouffer has falsely…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Kuklachev v. GelfmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  3. Thai v. Cayre Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Stadt v. Fox News Network LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. Malletier v. DONKEY & BOURKE, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API