Legal Opinion
Keady v. Nike, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 1, 2001No. Docket No. 00-9339PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part and VACATED AND REMANDED in part.
Plaintiff-Appellant James Keady appeals from the September 26, 2000 judgment of the district court entered upon the court’s September 21, 2000 opinion and order granting the motions to dismiss made by Defendants-Appellees Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) and St. John’s University (“St. John’s”), and denying Keady’s motion for leave to amend his complaint.
This case arises from Keady’s vocal opposition to the practices…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Connie Robison v. Susan R. Via and Harold HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- KAREN VAN ZANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES; And Kenneth Hasan King, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Keswani v. Sovereign Jewelry Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021