Guy v. Baer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.
The complaint must contain a plain and concise statement of the facts constituting a cause of action, without unnecessary-repetition; and each material allegation must be distinctly numbered. G-.S. 1-122.
The function of a complaint is not the narration of the evidence but the statement of the substantive and constituent facts upon which the plaintiffs’ claim to relief is founded. Winders v. Hill, 141 N.C. 694; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732, 40 S.E. 2d 412. Hence, “the facts constituting a cause of action” required by the statute are the material, ■essential, and ultimate facts which constitute…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Chason v. . MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Long v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Heath v. KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.