Legal Opinion

Chason v. . Marley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

The oft-repeated pertinent provision of C. S., 506, is: “The complaint must contain — (2) a plain and concise statement of the facts constituting a cause of action, without unnecessary repetition; and each material allegation must be distinctly numbered.”

This means that the material, essential, and ultimate facts upon which the right of action is based should be stated, and not collateral or evidential facts, which are only to be used to establish the ultimate facts. The plaintiff should allege all the material facts, the ultimate facts which-constitute the cause of action — but not the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Burriss v. . StarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Moore v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Smith v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Thomas & Howard Co. of Shelby, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Guy v. BaerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Foust v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Gillispie v. Goodyear Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API