Legal Opinion
Jones v. Bernanke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 11, 2007No. Civil Action 04-1696 (RMU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Charles Blaine Jones, brings a four-count employment discrimination complaint 2 against his former employer, the Federal Reserve Board. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant discriminated against him on account of his age and gender in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 633a et seq. and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-l et seq., respectively, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Scrivener v. Clark CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Pollard v. Quest DiagnosticsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Jones v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.