Legal Opinion
Pollard v. Quest Diagnostics
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 17, 2009No. Civil Action 07-692 (CKK)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Bridget Pollard (“Pollard” or “Plaintiff’), an African-American female, brings the instant lawsuit against her previous employer, Defendant Quest Diagnostics (“Quest” or “Defendant”), alleging claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”). Specifically, Pollard asserts a claim of disparate treatment based upon race and color in regard to allegations that Quest failed to promote Pollard while…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Nurriddin v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Brown v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hutchinson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Olatunji v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.