Legal Opinion

De Ayala v. MacKie

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2006No. 04-0160PublishedCited by 277 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

We deny the motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of April 21, 2006 and substitute the following in its place.

Maria Cristina Brittingham-Sada de Ayala (“Ayala”), defendant below, alleged that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this ancillary probate proceeding involving the estate of her father, a Mexican testator whose will was probated in Mexico. The trial court denied Ayala’s motion to dismiss, and she pursued an interlocutory appeal. The court of appeals concluded it had jurisdiction over the appeal, and the parties now agree. Because we disagree, we reverse…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Crowson v. WakehamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Logan v. McDaniel, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Bailey v. Cherokee County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by277 opinions

  1. Guyton v. Monteau, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  2. Eastland v. Eastland, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. In Guardianship of Moon, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  4. Estate of SavanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. in the Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013

272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API