Legal Opinion

King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2003No. 01-0430PublishedCited by 2,335 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jefferson

Various heirs of Major William Warren Chapman and his wife, Helen Chapman, seek title to an undivided one-half interest in 15,449.4 acres of property, much of it contained within the storied King Ranch in South Texas. The Chapman heirs allege that, in the late 1800s, their forebears’ lawyer conspired with Captain Richard King to deprive the Chapman heirs of rightful title to the property. Seeking to avoid an 1883 agreed judgment, they have filed a bill of review and a trespass to try title action. For the reasons set forth below, we reject their claims.

I

Factual Background

A. The Property

Roughly…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,335 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Forbes Inc. v. Granada Biosciences, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003

2,330 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API