Webb v. Gaskins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Defendants have assigned as errors all of the judge’s findings of fact, except finding of fact number two. Defendants’ assignments of error are not supported by any exception in the record, not even under the assignments of error. The only exception in the record is to the judgment.
This Court has universally held that an assignment of error not supported by an exception is ineffectual, and will not be considered on appeal. Our cases to that effect are legion. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223, and cases there cited; Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926; Tynes v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Evers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Milwaukee Insurance Co. v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- In Re the Estate of MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.