Legal Opinion

Williams v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1961No. 28PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

It is provided in 38 U.S.C.A., section 749, as follows: “Subject to regulations, the insured shall at all times have the right to change the beneficiary or beneficiaries of a United States Government life insurance policy without the consent of such beneficiary' or beneficiaries.”

In light of the provisions of the foregoing statute, the appellant concedes that since she did not pursue the exclusive procedure pro-' vided in 38 U.S.C.A., section 784, she has no claim against the Government of the United States, or any agency thereof, as a result of the adverse ruling of the Veterans’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. In Re Hendricksen's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Ruth Iola Hoffman v. United States of America, and Pearl L. LechnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Herrington v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Fleming v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API