Legal Opinion

City of Long Beach v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1934No. Civ. No. 5092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from an order refusing to retax costs in this condemnation suit in which the respondent was allowed “necessary expenses incurred” in preparation for the trial, including the cost of securing the services of an expert witness.

In this suit in eminent domain, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the condemnation of real property. After the rendition of judgment the proceedings were abandoned by the plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure. A judgment of dismissal was accordingly entered in which the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Los Angeles v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. City of Burbank v. NordahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. City of Long Beach v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API