City of Los Angeles v. Clay
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.
Three cases were consolidated upon appeal by the City of Los Angeles from orders denying motions to tax costs in eminent domain proceedings, following the dismissal thereof after trial.
The principal question presented necessitates an interpretation of section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to witness’ fees. It is therein provided: “Upon such abandonment, express or implied, on motion of the defendant, a judgment shall be entered dismissing the proceeding and awarding the defendant his costs and disbursements, which shall include all necessary expenses in currcd in preparing for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. VickersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by11 opinions
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Daly City v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District v. Pacific Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.