Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Clay

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket Nos. 7193, 7194, 7195PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

Three cases were consolidated upon appeal by the City of Los Angeles from orders denying motions to tax costs in eminent domain proceedings, following the dismissal thereof after trial.

The principal question presented necessitates an interpretation of section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to witness’ fees. It is therein provided: “Upon such abandonment, express or implied, on motion of the defendant, a judgment shall be entered dismissing the proceeding and awarding the defendant his costs and disbursements, which shall include all necessary expenses in currcd in preparing for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. VickersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. City of Los Angeles v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Daly City v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District v. Pacific Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API