People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Bowman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
In a condemnation proceeding brought by the State for highway purposes in which compensation for the taking was later assessed by the jury at $28,000, two expert valuation witnesses, Elmer Moody and Ed Roy, testified on behalf of defendant and the only respondent herein, John F. DeCosta. After the jury verdict the trial court, on motion of the defendant, ordered costs of suit taxed at $402.10, which award became part of the judgment of condemnation. The State appeals from that part of the order fixing defendant’s costs and awarding the same in excess of $14.60, and denying its motion to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District v. Pacific Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ChubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Phoenix v. MoriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. DaskalasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.