Metropolitan Water District v. Adams
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
During the trial of a consolidated condemnation action, a compromise was reached providing for an abandonment of the litigation insofar as compensation was sought by Lawrence and Gertrude E. Holmes, two of the property owners, for any minerals lying 300 or more feet below the surface of the ground. By this agreement, there was eliminated from further consideration the value of mineral deposits upon the Holmes property.
After judgment was rendered, Holmes and his wife filed cost bills claiming a total amount of about $13,000 for the fees and expenses of four mining experts. Concededly, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- City of Los Angeles v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of Long Beach v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- City of Long Beach v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Davis v. KGO-T v. Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SorrentinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.