Legal Opinion

United States v. Gholston

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 19, 1983No. CM 441518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of indecent assault and assault and battery on two female soldiers, and assault on two sentinels in the execution of their duties in violation of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 934 (1976). His sentence, which was approved by the convening authority, consisted of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three years, total-forfeitures, and reduction to Private E-l.

Appellant contends that the evidence of record is insufficient to support his conviction of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. HattleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MeansU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. BowieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. KelleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. KoonceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API