Keller Supply Co. v. Lydig Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Lydig Construction, Inc. (Lydig) and Federal Insurance Company (Federal) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of Keller Supply Company, Inc. (Keller). The question presented is whether Keller substantially complied with the preclaim notice requirements of RCW 39.08 (hereinafter the Bond Act) and RCW 60.28 (hereinafter the Retainage Act). We affirm.
In May of 1986, Lydig, as the project general contractor, and Warrior Mechanical, Inc. (Warrior), as the mechanical subcontractor, commenced work on the University of Washington Husky Stadium Expansion Project. As required by law, Lydig posted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Strandell v. MoranWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- CH2M Hill, Inc. v. Greg Bogart & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Okee Industries, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Thompson v. Peninsula School District No. 401Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Transtech Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Transtech Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Diamaco, Inc. v. MettlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.