Legal Opinion

Strandell v. Moran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1908No. 7062PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Neterer, J., entered April 25, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a contractor’s surety bond.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In December, 1903, the appellant Moran entered into a contract with the city of Whatcom (now Bellingham) by the terms of which he agreed, for a stated consideration, to grade and otherwise improve Maple street, *534in that city, according to certain specifications attached to the contract. At the time of entering into the contract Moran gave a bond on which his coappellants were sureties, in the sum ,of $6,500, running to the state-of Washington, conditioned that he would pay for all material that it should be necessary to use in the successful performance of the work. While Moran was performing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Robinson v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Keller Supply Co. v. Lydig Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API