Legal Opinion

Diamaco, Inc. v. Mettler

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 23, 2006No. 56234-7-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 While the award of attorney fees is not discretionary under the bond and retainage statutes pertaining to public work contracts, the amount of any such award is discretionary. An attorney’s submission of actual fees does not remove the trial court’s authority and duty to review those fees to determine whether they are reasonable. In the instant case, the trial court discharged that duty. Absent a showing of an abuse of discretion, an appellate court will not overturn an award of attorney fees. Here, there was no such abuse. Accordingly, the trial court’s award of attorney fees is affirmed.

F…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Brand v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Boeing Co. v. HeidyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sackett v. SantilliWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lakeside Pump & Equipment, Inc. v. Austin Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell Crane & Rigging Services, Inc. v. Dynamic International AK, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Cortinas Painting & Restoration v. Corp Inc. & Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Scarsella Brothers, Inc., App/cr-resp v. Flatiron Constructors Inc., Resp/cr-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API