Legal Opinion

CH2M Hill, Inc. v. Greg Bogart & Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 1987No. 17848-2-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dore, J.*

CH2M Hill, Inc., appeals the summary judgment dismissal of respondents from its action to foreclose an engineering lien. We hold that the engineering lien statute does not incorporate the priority provisions of the mechanics' lien statute. Therefore we affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

CH2M Hill, Inc., commenced performing engineering work on an undeveloped parcel of land known as Lakemont Estates on March 15, 1984. On March 30,1984 respondents acquired and recorded interests in the property: Washington Mutual Savings Bank recorded a first deed of trust for which Chicago Title…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brandt v. ImperoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Irwin Concrete, Inc. v. Sun Coast Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Roe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Structurals Northwest, Ltd. v. Fifth & Park Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schumacher Painting Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Keller Supply Co. v. Lydig Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API