Kent v. Kent
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
Action to enforce the statutory liability of stockholders of the Ethyl Oil Company arising out of a loan of $50,000 made to that corporation by Bank of America and evidenced by a promissory note.
Appellants challenge the right of plaintiff to bring this action. It appears that the note sued upon was guaranteed by C. F. Whittier and J. M. Kent, president and vice-president of the borrower, and, the note not being paid, the bank sued the corporation and the guarantors and attached certain property which plaintiff here, Lillian D. Kent, claimed as her sole and separate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Imperial Livestock & Mortgage Co. v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Regan v. AlbinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Burkett v. DotyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Kahle v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Barling v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clejan v. ReismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Harmony Homes, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.