Legal Opinion

Regan v. Albin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1933No. Docket Nos. L.A. 14135, 14136PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

The above-entitled actions were brought to enforce stockholders’ liability for debts of a corporation, under the law existing prior to 1931. They were consolidated and tried under an agreed statement of facts.

Pasadena Milling Company, Inc., incorporated in California, had on November 30, 1925, an indebtedness of $146,241.92. On that date it secured a permit from the corporation commissioner to sell stock. The conditions of the permit were that it could (1) sell one share of common stock to each of five directors at $100 per share for cash; (2) sell 760 shares of common stock to Pasadena…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Eberhard v. Pacific Southwest Loan & Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Reno v. American Ice Machine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Walker v. Harbor Realty & Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Kent v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Blaise v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API