Burkett v. Doty
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to recover damages for the conversion of a promissory note executed September 25, 1911, for $1,395.85 by Harry Harrington to Nellie Mead Doty, the then wife of defendant. This note was the first of a series of three notes executed and delivered by Harrington to Mrs. Doty, each of the same date and for the same amount and secured by mortgage. The conversion is alleged to have occurred April 1, 1912.
Defendant answered, denied that plaintiff was on that day or at any other time the owner or entitled to the possession of said note or of any moneys due or to become due thereon;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Burkett v. DotyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Blackledge v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.