Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Insurance v. Maloney

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1995No. 21873, 21959PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

1. Arnica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Maloney and Silva v. Farmers Insurance Co. both present a common question on appeal: When an insurer has a subrogated interest in a portion of the insured’s settlement, is the insurer required to pay a proportionate share of the insured’s attorney’s fees incurred in settling the claim? In both cases the insureds argue that the settlement created a common fund which included the insurers’ subrogated interest. They therefore contend that the insurers were obligated to pay a proportionate share of the insureds’ attorneys’ fees. The insurers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Transport Indemnity Company v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Terrazas v. Garland & Loman, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Arguello v. Sunset Station, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Barreca v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. Gonzales v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Golden Estates v. Continental Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API