Legal Opinion

McCool v. Hoover Equipment Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1966No. 40924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal has been taken to review a judgment of the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, rendered against the defendant, M. C. McCool, d/b/a M-C-M Machine Works, et al., in the sum of $4,019. 06. The original action was filed by Ploover Equipment Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, and they have cross-appealed seeking a recovery greater than that rendered by the trial court.

Plaintiff dealt in second-hand crankshafts for caterpillar equipment which it sold to its customers to be installed in their equipment. Defendant was in the business of chroming used crankshafts. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Cox v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Bullard v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Gilbert Central Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Insul-Mark Midwest, Inc. v. Modern Materials, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lewis v. Anchorage Asphalt Paving Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API