Legal Opinion
Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 29, 1961PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This action was tried by the Court without a jury. It is an action to recover damages resulting from defendant’s alleged conversion of plaintiff’s property. The parties stipulated that the case would be determined by applying the law of New York.
The Facts
Plaintiff, Wm. H. Wise & Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Wise”), is a publishing concern. The defendant, Rand McNally & Co. (hereinafter referred to as “Rand”), is a printing establishment. Under an agreement dated on or about July 19, 1955, Wise engaged Rand to print 25,000 copies of plaintiff’s book entitled…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- J. A. Burgess Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Doris Filner v. Samuel Shapiro and Southwestern Alloys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Richard Francis Hallenbeck and Gertrude D. Hallenbeck v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Gilbert Central Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- William P. Wells D/B/A Recmart, Cross-Appellant v. 10-X Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.