Legal Opinion

Cox v. Curnutt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1954No. 35638PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEAL, Justice.

This is an action wherein plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the alleged faulty construction of a concrete driveway upon plaintiffs’ premises located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. C. C. Curnutt and Frances Curnutt, plaintiffs in the trial court, will be referred to as plaintiffs, and F. A. Cox and George H. Smith, defendants below, will here be referred to by their proper names.

In plaintiffs’ Amended Petition they allege that on November 9, 1948, they entered into a written contract with F. A. Cox for certain repairs on plaintiffs’ residence and for the. construction of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cotner v. MundySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Ruberoid Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Miller v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 56, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API