Galbreath v. Hopkins
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is brought to enjoin defendants from maintaining a ditch through which surface waters, accumulated in a natural lake or pond on the lands of defendant, are drained and discharged upon the land of plaintiff.
A judgment was entered in favor of defendants from which, and an order denying her motion for a new trLl, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff is the owner of three hundred and sixty acres of land in Sutter County, sloping in a general southerly or southeasterly direction. Commencing several miles above her land and extending through it, is a natural depression commonly known as Live Oak…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Collins v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Kall v. CarruthersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.