Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Pickwick Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 13, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

S. L. Bauman, the plaintiff, below has appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Shelby County, wherein his suit was dismissed; his suit was based on an alleged breach of contract. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proof, a motion for a directed verdict on behalf of the defendant was sustained. A motion for a new trial was seasonably filed, overruled, an appeal perfected, an.d the plaintiff has assigned two errors. By these errors it is insisted that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant for the reason that the court erroneously construed the contract sued on:

1st. As…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKay v. Louisville & Northern RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hardwick v. American Can Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Conley v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  4. Neilson & Kittle Canning Co. v. F. G. Lowe & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Nunnelly v. Warner Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. Maler Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API