Legal Opinion
Conley v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 16, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.
This suit was begun by bill in the Chancery Court of Coffee county on June 3, 1926, and is based on an insurance policy issued on August 17, 1922, by the defendant Insurance Company, by which policy the defendant contracted to insure the life of the complainant George DeBai^d Conley in the sum of $2500.
In addition to the life insurance contract, the policy contains provisions for a “Permanent Total Disability Benefit.” Basing his suit on the terms of the policy providing for the “Permanent Total Disability Benefit,” the complainant sued for monthly benefits of $25 each from May 10, 1924, to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Hawkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.