Legal Opinion

Neilson & Kittle Canning Co. v. F. G. Lowe & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This hill was filed to recover damages for breach of a contract to purchase a car of canned tuna fish, and is here on appeal by defendant, Lowe & Co., from a decree awarding damages. The first assignment complains of the exclusion by the chancellor of evidence offered by defendant of a. local custom that the buyer of goods of this character does not consider the contract closed until a formal contract has been signed between the parties. While this testimony was probably competent, as bearing upon the question of the state of mind or intention of the defendant, we are of opinion that its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. BurdickOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Empire Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Greenwood Grocery Co. v. Canadian County Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Teter v. Republic Parking System, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Balderacchi v. RuthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  3. Gurley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. APCO Amusement Co. v. Wilkins Family Restaurants of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API