Legal Opinion

Benton School Dist. No. 26 v. Woodard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1930No. File No. 6843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoddey, J.

This is an action to recover on a school treasurer’s surety bond. Defendant Woodard was treasurer of Benton school district No. 26, with defendants McMillan and Smith sureties on his official bond. Woodard was out of the state when the action was commenced, and the court never acquired jurisdiction over him. McMillan was served with summons in Spink county, but entered no appearance of any kind in the case, so that the action is really against Smith alone.

Woodard qualified as treasurer on the 5th day of June, 1924, and continued in office until the 26th day of November, 1926. Dur*116ing that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. VolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Arey v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City of Estelline v. CalefSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API